Characteristic |
Pooled observation |
Communities with PHCs |
Communities without PHCs |
Number of respondents |
900 |
475(52.8) |
425(47.2) |
Personal Characteristics |
|||
Maternal Age: |
|||
Mean(SD) |
34.4(7.2) |
34.9(7.4) |
33.9(6.9) |
16-19 |
21(2.4) |
12(2.5) |
9(2.2) |
20- 24 |
81(9.0) |
45(9.5) |
36(8.5) |
25-29 |
130(14.5) |
59(12.5) |
71(16.7) |
30-34 |
176(19.6) |
75(15.8) |
101(23.8) |
35-39 |
269(29.9) |
155(32.7) |
114(26.8) |
40-49 |
222(24.7) |
128(27.0) |
94(22.1) |
Maternal Education: |
|||
No formal Education |
193( 21.4) |
104(21.9) |
89(20.9) |
Primary |
490(54.4) |
271(57.1) |
219(51.5) |
Secondary |
205(22.8) |
72(8.0) |
85(20.0) |
Higher |
12(1.3) |
28( 3.1 ) |
32(7.5) |
Religion: |
|||
Catholic |
368(40.9) |
193(40.6) |
175(41.2) |
Other Christians |
442(49.1) |
226(47.6) |
216(50.8) |
Islam |
30(3.0) |
21(4.4) |
12(2.8) |
Traditionalist |
35(3.9) |
23(4.8) |
11(2.6) |
Others |
25(2.8) |
12(2.5) |
11(2.6) |
Monthly Income (N): |
|||
<5,000 |
383(42.6) |
249(52.5) |
134(33.5) |
5000-9,999 |
291(32.3) |
128(26.9) |
163(38.4) |
10,000-14,999 |
166(18.4) |
85(17.9) |
81(19.1) |
15,000-99,999 |
60(6.7) |
13(2.7) |
47(11.1) |
Media Exposure: |
|||
None |
177( 19.7) |
69(14.5) |
108(25.4) |
Low |
175(19.4) |
102(21.5) |
73(17.2) |
Moderate |
147(19.3) |
102(21.5) |
45(10.6) |
High |
368(40.9) |
175(36.8) |
193(45.4) |
Very high |
33(0.7) |
27(5.7) |
06(1.4) |
Employment Status: |
|||
Working |
859(95.4) |
451(94.9) |
408(96) |
Not Working |
41(4.6) |
24(5.1) |
17(4.0) |
Marital Status: |
|||
Married |
587(65.2) |
257(54.1) |
330(77.6) |
Living together |
294(32.7) |
204(42.9) |
90(21.2) |
Widowed |
04(0.4) |
04(0.8) |
01(0.2) |
Divorced |
08(0.9) |
07(1.5) |
03(0.7) |
Separated |
07(0.8) |
02(0.4) |
01(0.2) |
The time involved in walking to the nearest health center (in minutes): |
|||
< 30 |
326(36.2) |
169(35.6) |
157(25.1) |
30 - 59 |
55(6.1) |
45(9.5) |
10(2.4) |
? 60 |
519(57.7) |
261(54.9) |
258(72.5) |
Perception of Quality of Care in Nearest Health Center: |
|||
Poor |
590(65.6) |
272(57.3) |
318(74.8) |
Good |
57(6.3) |
37(7.8) |
20(4.7) |
Excellent |
253(28.1) |
166(34.9) |
87(20.5) |
*Analysis for determinants of early timing of ANC visits and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs were bounded for the 435 women of recent birth who reported utilizing ANC from PHCs
Table 1 Cont'd
Characteristic |
Pooled observation |
Communities with PHCs |
Communities without PHCs |
Pregnancy-Related Complication: |
|||
No |
614(68.2) |
326(68.6) |
288(67.8) |
Yes |
286(31.8) |
149(31.4) |
137(32.2) |
Birth Preparedness Plan: |
|||
No |
610(67.8) |
322(67.8) |
288(67.8) |
Yes |
290(32.2) |
153(32.2) |
137(32.2) |
Woman's level of autonomy: |
|||
No autonomy |
147(16.3) |
41(8.6) |
106(24.9) |
Low autonomy |
394(43.6) |
259(54.5) |
135(31.8) |
Moderate autonomy |
248(27.6) |
103(21.7) |
145(34.1) |
High autonomy |
74(8.2) |
48(10.1) |
26(6.1) |
Very high autonomy |
37(4.1) |
24(5.1) |
13(3.1) |
Reproductive Characteristics |
|||
The number of children ever given birth to: |
|||
0-2 |
183(20.3) |
120(25.2) |
63(14.8) |
3- 4 |
346(38.4) |
165(34.7) |
181(42.6) |
5+ |
371(41.2) |
90(40) |
181(42.6) |
Currently pregnant: |
189(67.0) |
||
Yes |
244( 27.1) |
153(32.2) |
91(21.4) |
No |
656(72.8) |
322(67.8) |
334(78.6) |
ANC: |
|||
Yes |
182(74.6) |
120(78.4) |
62(68.1) |
No |
62(25.4) |
33(21.6) |
29(31.9) |
Place of ANC: |
225(65.2) |
247(64.7) |
|
Other govt. Hospital |
22(12.1) |
11(9.2) |
11(17.7) |
PHC |
126(69.2) |
88(73.3) |
38(61.3) |
Private hospital |
20(10.9) |
10(8.3) |
10(16.1) |
Others/home |
14(7.7) |
11(9.2) |
3(4.8) |
Recent Birth (n = 819) |
|||
Antenatal care: |
|||
No |
192(23.4) |
80(18.8) |
112(28.4) |
Yes |
627(76.6) |
345(81.2) |
282(71.6) |
Place of Antenatal Care: |
|||
Other govt. Hospital |
72(11.4) |
20(5.8) |
52(19.5) |
PHC |
435*(69.4) |
238(68.9) |
197(69.9) |
Private hospital |
66(10.5) |
54(15.7) |
12(4.3) |
Others |
54(8.6) |
33(9.6) |
21(7.4) |
*Analysis for determinants of early timing of ANC visits and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs were bounded for the 435 women of recent birth who reported utilizing ANC from PHCs
Table 2: Association between Antenatal Care Utilization and Respondents' Socio-demographic Characteristics
Early timing of ANC Visits in PHCs |
A minimum of four ANC Visits in PHCs |
|||||
Number |
Yes N (%) |
Chi2/prob. |
Yes N (%) |
Chi2/prob. |
||
Maternal Age: |
||||||
16-19 |
6 |
03 (50.0) |
02 (33.3 ) |
(5) = 2.12 |
||
20 -24 |
23 |
11 (47.8) |
09 (39.1) |
ρ = 0.83 |
||
25-29 |
62 |
27 (43.5) |
(5) = 11.84 |
24 (38.7) |
||
30 -34 |
93 |
39( 41.9) |
ρ = 0.04** |
28(30.1) |
||
35-39 |
131 |
34(25.9) |
41(31.3) |
|||
40-49 |
120 |
51(42.5) |
43(35.8) |
|||
Maternal Education: |
||||||
No formal/primary |
365 |
148 (40.5) |
(3) = 11.84 |
123 (33.7) |
(3) = 2.11 |
|
Secondary/higher |
70 |
17 (24.3) |
ρ = 0.03** |
24(34.3 ) |
ρ = 0.55 |
|
Religion: |
||||||
Catholic |
168 |
66 (39.3) |
(2) = 4.74 |
56(33.3) |
(3) = 0.08 |
|
Other Christians |
222 |
76 (34.2) |
ρ = 0.09*** |
75( 33.8) |
ρ = 0.96 |
|
Others |
45 |
23(51.1) |
16( 35.6) |
|||
Marital Status: |
||||||
Married |
285 |
112(39.3) |
(2) = 1.24 |
88(30.9 ) |
(3) = 4.34 |
|
Living together |
138 |
50( 36.2) |
ρ = 0.54 |
56(40.6 ) |
ρ = 0.11 |
|
Others |
12 |
03 (25.0 ) |
03( 25.0 ) |
|||
Employment Status: |
||||||
Working |
417 |
161 (38.6) |
(1) = 1.96 |
140(33.6 ) |
(3) = 0.22 |
|
Not Working |
18 |
04( 22.2) |
ρ = 0.16 |
07 (38.9) |
ρ = 0.64 |
|
Exposure to Media: |
||||||
No Exposure |
86 |
34 (39.5) |
(4) = 9.27 |
28( 32.6) |
(3) = 7.48 |
|
Low Exposure |
94 |
46(48.9) |
ρ = 0.06*** |
36 (38.3) |
ρ = 0. 11 |
|
Moderate Exposure |
75 |
23(30.7) |
29 (38.7) |
|||
High Exposure |
168 |
60(35.7) |
47(27.9) |
|||
Very High Exposure |
12 |
02(16.7 ) |
07(58.3 ) |
|||
Woman's level of autonomy : |
||||||
No autonomy |
57 |
18(31.6) |
(4) = 4.04 |
17(29.8 ) |
(4) = 6.48 |
|
Low autonomy |
222 |
92(41.4) |
ρ = 0.40 |
75 (33.8) |
ρ = 0.17 |
|
Moderate autonomy |
103 |
33(32.0) |
33 ( 32.0) |
|||
High autonomy |
35 |
14(40.0) |
18(51.4) |
|||
Very high |
18 |
08(44.4) |
04 (22.2) |
|||
The number of children ever given birth to: |
||||||
1-2 |
66 |
19(28.8) |
(2) = 2.92 |
23( 34.8) |
(4) = 0.05 |
|
3-4 |
174 |
67(38.5) |
ρ = 0.23 |
59(33.9) |
ρ = 0.97 |
|
5+ |
195 |
79(40.5) |
65(33.3) |
*p<0.01, ** p<0.05 ***p<0.1.
Table 2: Cont’d
Early timing of ANC Visits in PHCs |
A minimum of four ANC Visits in PHCs |
|||||
Monthly Income (N): |
||||||
0 |
18 |
04(22.2) |
(4) = 5.11 |
07(38.8) |
(4) = 11.46 |
|
<5,000 |
181 |
78(43.1) |
ρ = 0.28 |
63 (34.8) |
ρ = 0.02** |
|
5,000 -9,999 |
148 |
52( 35.1) |
37(25.0) |
|||
10,000 -14,999 |
74 |
25(33.8) |
35( 47.3) |
|||
15,000- 99,999 |
14 |
06( 42.9 ) |
05(35.7) |
|||
The time involved in walking to the nearest health center (in minutes): |
||||||
< 30 |
195 |
123( 63.1) |
(2) = 94.95 |
140 (71.8) |
(2) = 230.26 |
|
30 - 59 |
25 |
04(16.0) |
ρ = 0.00* |
04 (16.0) |
ρ = 0.00* |
|
? 60 |
215 |
38(17.7) |
03(1.4) |
|||
Perception of Quality of Care in Nearest Health Center: |
||||||
Poor |
260 |
75 (28.8 ) |
(2) = 26.72 |
04 (1.5) |
(2) = 331.66 |
|
Good |
31 |
11 (35.5) |
ρ = 0.00* |
12 (38.7) |
ρ = 0.00* |
|
Excellent |
`144 |
79 (54.9) |
131 (90.9) |
|||
Pregnancy-Related Complication: |
||||||
Yes |
170 |
158(92.9) |
(2) = 358.68 |
87(51.2) |
(2) = 32.69 |
|
No |
265 |
07(2.6) |
ρ = 0.00* |
60( 22.6) |
ρ = 0.00* |
|
Birth Preparedness Plan: |
||||||
No |
265 |
10( 3.8 ) |
(2) = 336.04 |
62( 23.4) |
(2) = 32.76 |
|
Yes |
170 |
155(91.2) |
ρ = 0.00* |
85( 50.0) |
ρ = 0.00* |
*p<0.01, ** p<0.05 ***p<0.1.
While 92.9% of women who reported they once suffered pregnancy-related complications made early ANC visits in PHCs only 2.6% of those who did not have such experience met such standards. Birth preparedness plan influenced early timing in use of PHCs so that 91.2% of women who in the course of last pregnancy prepared for delivery made timely ANC visits in PHCs while 3.8% of those who made no preparation were able to make their ANC within the first three months of pregnancy. Other variables which include, marital status, woman's level of autonomy, employment status, number of children ever given birth to, and monthly income were not found to be significantly associated with early timing of ANC visits in PHCs [ρ > 0.05].
Factors Associated with a minimum of Four ANC Visits in PHCs
The Chi-square test, which examined the association between socio-demographic factors and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs is presented in Table 2. A minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs was significantly influenced by monthly income, time involved in walking to the nearest health centers, perception of the quality of care rendered in the nearest health center, pregnancy-related complications, and birth preparedness [ρ < 0.05]. A higher proportion of women who earned between N (10,000 -14,900) [47.3%] made a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. While 71.8% of those who lived within 30 minutes' walk to the nearest PHCs made at least four ANC visit in PHCs; 16.0% of those who live within 30-59 minutes' walk made early visit and 7.9% of those who lived within at least 60 minutes' walk made at least four ANC visits in PHCs. A higher proportion of women who rated the quality of care in nearest PHCs as excellent made at least four ANC visits in PHCs [90.9%] compared to women who rated poor [38.7%] and good [1.5%]. Experience with previous pregnancy-related complications significantly influenced a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs [P = 0.00].
Consequently, 51.2% of women who once experienced pregnancy-related complications made a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs only 22.6% of those without such experience made up to four ANC visits in PHCs. Also, birth preparedness significantly influenced a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs [p = 0.00]. While 50% of women who prepared for delivery made a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs it is only 23.4% of those who did not prepare that met this standard. The other variables which are maternal age, maternal education, religion, marital status, employment status, exposure to media, woman's level of autonomy and number of children ever given birth to were not found to be significantly associated with a minimum of four ANC visits inPHCs[ρ>0.05].
Table 3: Logistic Regression Model Predicting the Likelihood of making early ANC visits in PHC.
Variables |
Adjusted Odd ratios (probability values) |
||
Pooled observation |
Communities with PHCs |
Communities without PHCs |
|
Maternal age: |
|||
16-19(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
20-24 |
7.29 (0.51) |
17.06(0.62) |
0.50(0.69) |
25-29 |
0.77 (0.93) |
0.09(0.70) |
1.34(0.86) |
30-34 |
0.19 (0.58) |
0.11(0.70) |
0.61(0.76) |
35-39 |
0.15 (0.52) |
0.04(0.57) |
0.24(0.39) |
40-49 |
0.21 (0.61) |
0.17(0.71) |
0.35(0.53) |
Maternal Education: |
|||
None(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Primary |
1.89(0.44) |
2.99(0.39) |
1.37(0.62) |
?Secondary |
0.27(0.22) |
1.16(0.05)** |
0.58(0.49) |
Employment Status: |
|||
Not working(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Working |
19.15(0.04)** |
176.99(0.01)* |
1.95(0.59) |
Number of children ever given birth to: |
|||
1-2(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
04-Mar |
3.08(0.22) |
10.11(0.42) |
0.83(0.81) |
5+ |
8.35(0.04)** |
30.17(0.02)** |
1.22(0.81) |
Exposure to Media: |
|||
No exposure(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Low exposure |
2.43(0.38) |
1.54(0.78) |
1.23(0.89) |
Moderate Exposure |
4.21(0.20) |
21.69(0.14) |
1.98(0.78) |
High Exposure |
2.15(0.42) |
2.60(0.55) |
2.15(0.98) |
Very High Exposure |
0.21(0.36) |
0.34(0.62) |
3.56(0.11) |
*p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001.ref: reference category ------------------------ Variables omitted from a model.
Table 3: Cont’d
Variables |
Adjusted Odd ratios (probability values) |
||
Pooled observation |
Communities with PHCs |
Communities without PHCs |
|
The time involved in walking to the nearest health center (in minutes): |
|||
< 30 minutes (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
30-59 minutes |
0.33(0.42) |
0.16(0.00)* |
|
? 60 minutes |
0.11(0.02)** |
0.05(0.04)** |
0.22(0.00) |
Perception of Quality of Care in Nearest Health Center: |
|||
Poor (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Good |
0.88(0.91) |
0.24(0.37) |
0.34(0.26) |
Excellent |
0.71(0.69) |
0.41(0.47) |
1.28(0.04)** |
Pregnancy–Related Complication: |
|||
No (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Yes |
638.95(0.00)* |
2079.6(0.00)* |
2.34(0.74) |
Birth preparedness plan: |
|||
No (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Yes |
9.73(0.12) |
11.32(0.17) |
1.45(0.45) |
Communities: |
|||
Communities with PHCs (ref) |
1.00 |
----------- |
------------- |
Communities without PHCs |
0.09(0.00)* |
||
Number of observation |
435.00 |
255.00 |
177.00 |
LR Chi2 |
477.40 |
272.42 |
84.52 |
Probability |
(0.00)* |
(0.00)* |
(0.00)* |
Count R2 |
0.83 |
0.84 |
0.35 |
*p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001.ref: reference category ------------------------ Variables omitted from a model.
Determinants of Early Timing of ANC in PHCs
The individual-level variables that significantly predict early timing in ANC utilization in PHCs include employment status, number of children ever given birth to, time involved in traveling to the nearest health center, pregnancy-related complications, and the set of communities [Table 3]. First, we examine the goodness-of-fit of the early ANC model by estimating the count R2. The count R2 puts at 72% shows that the selected socio-demographic factors account for 83% variation in early timing of ANC visits in PHCs, while only 17% could not be accounted for. Thus, the early ANC model has impressive goodness-of-fit. Also, the entire model is statistically significant given the log-likelihood statistics [477.4] with ρ= 0.00. The odds for reporting early timing of ANC visits in PHCs are significantly higher for working women [aOR: 19.15, ρ = 0.04]. Women who reported at least five births ? 5 [aOR: 8.35, ρ = 0.04] reported an approximately eight-fold increase in the odds for making early ANC visits in PHCs. Women who have to walk for at least 60 minutes to the nearest healthcare centers [aOR: 0.11, ρ = 0.02] were 89% significantly less likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. Those who reported they once experience pregnancy-related complications [aOR: 638.95, ρ = 0.00] were 638.95 times significantly more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. There was a statistically significant difference between the two sets of communities concerning making early ANC visits in PHCs. Making early ANC in PHCs was significantly less likely in the set of communities without PHCs [aOR: 0.09, ρ= 0.00]. Thus, separate analyses were conducted for the two sets of communities to determine what differences there might be between them in the predictors of early ANC utilization in PHCs. For the set of communities with PHCs, maternal education, employment status, number of children ever given birth to, time involved in traveling to the nearest health center, and pregnancy-related complications are the significant predictors of early ANC visits in PHCs. In reference to women who reported no formal education, those who reported at least secondary educational qualification [aOR: 1.16, ρ = 0.05] were 16% significantly less likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. Working women [aOR: 176.99, ρ = 0.01] were 176.99 times significantly more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs when compared with non-working women. In reference to those who lived within 30 minutes' walk to the nearest healthcare center, those who live within 30-59 minutes' walk [aOR: 0.16, ρ = 0.00] and those who live at least 60 minutes' walk to the nearest healthcare centers [aOR: 0.05, ρ = 0.04] were respectively 84% and 95% significantly less likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. Women who reported they once experience pregnancy-related complications [aOR: 2079.6, ρ = 0.00] were 2,079.6 times significantly more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. Among the set of communities without PHCs, it is only perception of the quality of care in the nearest healthcare center that significantly influenced early ANC visits in PHCs. In reference to women who reported the quality of care in the nearest healthcare center as poor, those who rated excellent [aOR: 1.28, ρ = 0.04] were 28% significantly more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs.
Determinants of a Minimum of Four ANC Visits in PHCs
The individual-level variables that significantly influence a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs include maternal education, time involved in traveling to the nearest health center, perception of the quality of care in the nearest health center, and the sets of communities [see Table 4]. First, we examine the goodness-of-fit of a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs model by estimating the count R2. The count R2 puts at 88% shows that the selected socio-demographic factors account for 88% variation in a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs, while only 12% could not be accounted for. Thus, the minimum of four ANC model has impressive goodness-of-fit. Also, the entire model is statistically significant given the log-likelihood statistics [477.20] with ρ = 0.00. The odds for reporting a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs are significantly higher for women who reported at least secondary educational qualification [aOR: 10.47, ρ = 0.07] compared with those with no formal education. In reference to women who lived within 30 minutes' walk to the nearest health centers, those who lived within 30-59 minutes' walk [aOR: 0.02, ρ = 0.00 ] and at least 60 minutes' walk [aOR:0.00, ρ = 0.00] were respectively 98% and 100% significantly less likely to make a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. There was a statistically significant difference between the two sets of communities with respect to making a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. Making a minimum of four ANC in PHCs was significantly less likely in the set of communities without PHCs [aOR: 0.24, ρ= 0.00]. Thus, separate analyses were conducted for the two sets of communities to determine what differences there might be between them in the predictors of at least four ANC visits in PHCs. Among sets of communities with PHCs, maternal education, time involved in traveling to the nearest healthcare centers, and perceptions of the quality of care rendered in the nearest healthcare center were the significant predictors of a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. In reference to women who reported no formal education, those who reported primary educational qualification [aOR: 35.11, ρ = 0.04] were 3,411% significantly more likely to make a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. In reference to women who require less than 30 minutes' walk to the nearest healthcare centers, those who require 30-59 minutes' walk [aOR: 0.01, ρ = 0.01] and those who require at least 60 minutes' walk [aOR:0.00, ρ = 0.00] were respectively 99% and 100% significantly less likely to make a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. In reference to those who rated the quality of care in the nearest healthcare center to be poor, those who rated good [aOR: 53.42, ρ = 0.00] reported an approximately 53-fold increase in the odds for making a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. Among the set of communities without PHCs, only monthly income was the significant predictor of a minimum of four ANC in PHCs. In reference to women who were not employed, those who earned below N5, 000 [aOR: 3214870, ρ = 0.00], between N (5,000-9,999) [aOR: 2243775, ρ = 0.00]; between N(10,000-14,999) [aOR: 554026.60, ρ = 0.00] and between N(15,000-99,999) [aOR: 5.31e+13, ρ = 0.00] were respectively 3214870, 2243775, 554026.60 and 5.31e+13 significantly more likely to make a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs.
Discussion
The study investigated in eight rural communities the factors that determine early timing in ANC visits and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. Unlike past studies that focused on maternal care in general (that is, not considering the source where the care is utilized from), this study focused on the PHC component of maternal health services. The study was motivated by the fact that the PHC system is the most affordable and accessible healthcare system that can provide basic ANC and delivery care to pregnant women living in the rural part of Nigeria. In Nigeria, there are few secondary and tertiary healthcare centers, and they are often located in urban areas where rural women cannot travel to due to distance and transport costs [17]. Hence, PHCs offers rural women the opportunity to utilize modern health care services.
The result from the study revealed that 53.1% (435/819) of women with recent birth utilized ANC in PHCs. ANC coverage rate in PHCs recorded in this study is average. The ANC coverage rate in PHCs reported in this study is above the coverage rate of 29.6% reported by Ejembi et al. [26], but lower than the coverage rate of 62.1% recorded by Okonofual et al. [12] and 79% recorded by Alenoghena, Isah and Issara [31]. The utilization rate can be said to be unimpressive given that the PHC system is the closest healthcare, and there are more PHCs compared to secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities in the rural part of Nigeria. This study, therefore, corroborates the report made by Okonofua et al. [12] and Yaya et al [33], that PHCs are underutilized for maternal care needs. In the literature, several factors were reported as barriers to women intending to utilize maternal care from PHCs. Notable among the barriers is the poor quality of care [12]. Hence, there should be a complete renovation of PHC facilities in the study area, to improve the quality of care rendered in PHCs.
We reported that women who reported at least secondary education were significantly more likely to make a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. Among the set of communities with PHCs, women who reported at least secondary educational qualifications were 16% significantly more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. This finding conforms to that of Ajayi & Osakinle [34], who advocated for a minimum of secondary education for women in the study area. It is, therefore pertinent that intervention programs should be initiated that encouraged rural women to have a minimum of primary education. School curriculum should be designed to have topics on reproductive health where women will be taught on the benefits of both early timings in the use of ANC and adequacy of ANC visits.
We also found that time involved in traveling to the nearest healthcare center was a significant predictor of a minimum of four ANC visits and early ANC visits in PHCs. Respondents whose homes were more than 60 minutes' walk to the nearest health center were respectively 99% and 99.9% significantly less likely to make early ANC visits and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. It shows there are still several underserved communities in the rural part of Delta State and that PHCs are not evenly distributed across the rural part of Nigeria. Women who live far away from health centers will find it difficult to start ANC checkups, and even when they do start, they may not meet up with the recommended number of visits. Distance barriers are particularly prominent in poor-resource settings such as the rural part of Nigeria [34]. Several of the women in the rural part of the country are engaged in the informal sector and often may not have the money to pay as transport fare to health centers. Besides, the opportunity costs of time in traveling to health centers may discourage several Nigerian women from making up to four ANC visits in PHCs. This is linked to the scarcity of health facilities especially in the rural part of the country [35]. Gage [36] reported a strong tie between the quantity and quality of ANC and distance to health facilities.
Table 4: Logistic Regression Model Predicting the Likelihood of making a minimum of four ANC visits in PHC.
Variables |
Adjusted Odd ratios (probability values) |
||
Pooled observation |
Communities with PHCs |
Communities without PHCs |
|
Maternal Education: |
|||
None(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Primary |
5.56(0.10) |
35.11(0.04)** |
0.46(0.67) |
?Secondary |
10.47(0.07)*** |
14.11(0.14) |
1.10e+14(0.99) |
Monthly Income(N): |
|||
0(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
<5,000 |
0.31(0.49) |
0.45(0.32) |
3214870(0.00)* |
5,000-9,999 |
0.22(0.38) |
0.17(0.78) |
2243775(0.00)* |
10,000-14,999 |
0.55(0.74) |
2.11(0.45) |
554026.60(0.00)* |
15,000-99,999 |
- - - - - - - - - - |
1.35(0.78) |
5.31e+13(0.00)* |
Number of children ever given birth to: |
|||
1-2 (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
04-Mar |
1.20(0.84) |
7.22(0.10) |
0.06(0.18) |
5+ |
1.89(0.49) |
1.79(0.59) |
0.71(0.80) |
Employment Status: |
|||
Not working (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Working |
3.11(0.67) |
1.87(0.98) |
2.31(0.87) |
Time involved in walking to the nearest health center (in minutes): |
|||
< 30 minutes (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
30-59 minutes |
0.02(0.00)* |
0.01(0.01)* |
0.67(.078) |
? 60 minutes |
0.00(0.00)* |
0.00(0.00)* |
0.89(0.98) |
Perception of Quality of Care in Nearest Health Center: |
|||
poor (ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Good |
26.78(0.00)* |
53.42(0.00)* |
1.62e+16(0.99) |
Excellent |
1527.95(0.00)* |
11.98(0.65) |
2.91e+17(0.99) |
Pregnancy- Related Complication: |
|||
No(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Yes |
0.72(0.76) |
2.31( 0.78) |
14.96(0.12) |
Birth preparedness plan: |
|||
No(ref) |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Yes |
2.63(0.74) |
4.56(0.78) |
6.11(0.89) |
Communities: |
|||
Communities with PHCs (ref) |
1.00 |
---------------- |
------------------- |
Communities without PHCs |
0.24(0.05)* |
||
Number of observation |
435.00 |
256.00 |
179.00 |
LR Chi2 |
477.20 |
300.70 |
178.11 |
Probability |
(0.00)* |
(0.00)* |
(0.00)* |
Count R2 |
0.88 |
0.89 |
0.84 |
t*p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001.ref: reference category
------------------- Variables omitted from the model.
- - - - -omitted due to problems of collinearity
There is a need to establish more health centers that render ANC services in the rural part of Nigeria [35]. According to Fagbamigbe & Idemudia [6], for ANC coverage rate in developing countries to catch up with the rate in developed countries the ANC must be rendered free of charge with services rendered to pregnant women at their doorsteps and one health center should be sited within each 15 km radius.
The study further revealed that respondents with at least five births were more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. This conforms to findings from a Columbian study [37], though at variance with past Nigerian study [6], an Indian report [38] and an Ethiopian study [39] and a Ghana study that reported that ANC utilization reduces as mother's age increased and with increasing birth order [23]. The finding supports the views maintained by several authors that women who have given birth to several numbers of children have a better knowledge of maternal complications and are more apt to adopt precautionary measures to avert complications. This calls for programs and policies that will ensure early timing in the use of ANC and promote positive maternal care behaviour among all women irrespective of parity. Intervention programmes designed to improve maternal care behaviours should focus more on younger women with a few numbers of children.
Our study concurs with the report from other studies that women with a history of pregnancy-related complications are more likely to utilize maternal care services promptly [40, 41, 42]. This study report that women who once experienced pregnancy-related complications reported higher odds of making early visits in PHCs. Women who once experience complications take precautionary measures to avoid further complications, hence they are more likely to initiate early ANC visits.
We found out that women who were employed were significantly more likely to make early ANC visits in PHCs. This finding conforms to the findings from several other studies [44, 45]. The reason adduced for the result is that employed women have access to financial resources, and as such, they may not necessarily depend on their husbands for healthcare-related needs. A recent Nigerian study reported that women who depended on their husbands to fund their health expenses suffered delays in accessing modern maternal care services [46]. Also, women who are engaged in economic activities outside the homes are mobile and socialize with people even at the places of work; and they can easily acquire information that will improve their attitude towards modern care usage [44]. Also, among the set of communities without PHCs, monthly income significantly influenced the initiation of early ANC visits. Women who were employed and earning income reported higher odds for making early ANC visits. It is not any source of a surprise given that utilization of maternal care involves a lot of costs incurred in medication, transportation, and consultation [44]. Therefore, intervention programmes designed to improve women's health in the study area should focus on unemployed women without a source of income.
Finally, the results revealed that women drawn from among the set of communities without PHCs were less likely to make early ANC visits and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. The odds for making early ANC visits and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs were respectively 91% and 76% significantly less likely for respondents drawn from among the set of communities without PHCs. A different set of factors accounted for the two indicators among the two sets of communities. This discrepancy hence suggests that predictors of ANC utilization vary by geographical locations even though the communities were all located in the same political wards. Intervention programmes designed to improve ANC utilization among the communities must first understand the contextual determinants of ANC utilization in both sets of communities.
Strength and Limitations
The strength of this study is that it disaggregated maternal care into its PHC component; hence, the study investigated predictors of ANC from the most essential and entry care level. However, the findings of the study should be viewed in light of three limitations. First, the study did not examine the complete factors that may influence ANC utilization. It focused only on the demand-side factors, while the supply-side factors were ignored. To yield deeper insight into the factors that influence ANC utilization, both demand and supply-side factors should be examined simultaneously. Second, the data analyzed were obtained through verbal reports and were not subjected to any form of validation, such as the use of health facility cards. Third, there is a tendency that respondents gave socially-desirable responses.
Conclusion
Women in the study area utilized ANC from PHCs moderately. Distance barriers, perception of the quality of care, and employment status are among the factors that influence women's decision to make an early and a minimum of four ANC visits in PHCs. Intervention programmes that initiate innovative models that address these barriers will no doubt improve women's attitudes in initiating early ANC visits and making a minimum of four visits in PHCs
Abbreviations
SSA: sub-Saharan African; PHC: Primary Health Care; ANC: Antenatal care; WHO: World Health Organization; UNICEF: United Nation Children Education Fund; UNFPA: United Nation Fund for Population Agency; NDHS: National Demographic Health Survey; MCH: Maternal and Child Health; NPHCDA: National Primary Health Care Development Agency; MDG: Millennium Development Goals; FMoH: Federal Ministry of Health; MSS: Midwife Services Scheme; IMCH: Integrated Maternal and Child Health.
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful to the data collectors particularly Grace Chioma Igbojekwe
Funding
None.
Competing Interests
None declared.
Availability of Data and Materials
The dataset used and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References:
- World Health Organization. Coverage of maternity care. A tabulation of available Information, 3rd edition maternal health, and safe motherhood programme, Division of FamilyHealth, Geneva: WHO; 1993. Available at www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63878. [Accessed on the 18thof August 2018].
- Thaddeus S, Maine, D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context, Social Science andMedicine 1994; 38(8):1091-1110.
- Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-anoh S, Gomez P, Munjaja S. Antenatal care: opportunities for Africa's newborns. New York, NY: World Health Organization; 2010. Available athttp://www.who.int/pmchmedia/publications/connection III[Accessed on the 11th of September, 2015].
- World Bank. World development indicators: GNI per capita, PPP;2013(b). Available at http://data.Worldbank.org/indicators/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.CD [Accessed on the 6th of May, 2017].
- World Health Organization: Making pregnancy safer, the critical role of skilled attendants a joint statement by WHO, ICM, and FIGO. Geneva: WHO; 2004. Available at www.who.int-pregnancy safer/documents/9241891692 [Accessed on the 15th of June, 2017].
- Fagbamigbe, AF, Idemudia, ES. Wealth and antenatal care utilization in Nigeria: policy implications. Health care for Women International. 2017 38:1, 17-37, Doi:10.1080/07399332.2016.1225743
- National Population Commission, ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: National Population Commission, Nigeria, and ICF International; 2014.
- World Health Organization. Maternal Mortality, Geneva: WHO; 2004 Available at www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-mortality [Accessed on the 6th of January, 2017].
- Dairu T, Oche OM. Determinants of antenatal care, institutional delivery and postnatal care services utilization in Nigeria. Pan Africa Medical Journal.2015; 22(1).
- Desalew Z A, Bekele B, Kedir T, Desalegn, AA. Factors affecting utilization of maternal Healthcare in Kombolcha District Eastern Harareghe Zone, Ororoma Regional State,Eastern Ethiopia. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014(2014), Doi.org/10.1155/2014/917058
- Babalola S, Fatusi AO. Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria- looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy and Child Birth.2009; 9,43, Doi:org/10.1186/14718- 23938- 98- 43.
- Okonofua F, Ntoimo L, Ogungbangbe J, Anjorin S, Imongan W, Yaya S. Predictors of women's utilization of primary health care for skilled pregnancy care in rural Nigeria. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):106.
- Chakraborty N, Islam MA, Chowdhury, RI, Akhter, NN. Determinants of the Use of maternal health services in rural Bangladesh: Health promotion International.2003; 18(4):327-337.
- Etukudo IW, Inyang, AA. Determinants of use of maternal health care services in a rural Nigerian community. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2014; 4(18), 55-60.
- Oko-Offoboche C. The politics of Maternal Mortality and Morbidity: Examining women's Human Rights and Reproductive wrongs. Multi-disciplinary Journal of Research and Development Perspectives. 2014; 3(2), 59- 71
- Mojekwu J, Ibekwe N. Maternal mortality in Nigeria: Examination of intervention methods. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.2012; 2(20), 135-149.
- Yaya S, Okonofua FE, Ntoimo L, Kadio B, Deuboue, Imongan W, Balami W.Increasing Women's access to skilled pregnancy care to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in rural Edo state, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial.Global Health Research and Policy.2018; 3:12.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0066-y.
- World Health Organization: World Health Report. WHO Geneva; 2000. , available at Who .int/whr/2000/en/[Accessed on the 21st May, 2018].
- Al-Nahedh NNA (1995), Factors affecting the choice of maternal and child health services in the rural areas of Saudi Arabia. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 1995;1(2), 261-269.
- Lucas, AO, Gilles HH. Short Textbook of Public Health Medicine for the Tropics, London, Book power; 2003.
- Arthur. Wealth and antenatal care use: implications for maternal health care utilization in Ghana. Health Economics Review, 2012; 2(14): 1-18,Doi:org/10.1186/2191-1991-2-14.
- World Health Organization: Antenatal care Department of Technical working Group 1994 WHO/Frit/msm/968:1999
- Villar J, Baaqeel, H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizan J, Farnot U. et al. WHO ANC randomized trial for evaluation of a new model of routine ANC. Lancet. 2001; 357,1551-1564.
- Azuh DE, Azuh AE, Iweala EJ, Adeloye D, Akanbi M, Mordi CR. Factors influencing maternal mortality among rural communities in southwestern Nigeria, International Journal of Women's Health. 2017(9):179-187.
- Okonofua, FE. Increasing life expectancy through improved maternal and child health programming in Nigeria Paper presented at the breakfast meeting with Mr. President Chief Olusegun Obasanjo GCFR at Aso Rock Villa, Abuja organized.
- Ejembi C, Alti-Muazu M, Chirdan O, Ezeh H, Sheidu S, Dahiru T. Utilization of maternal health services by rural Hausa women in Zaria environs, northern Nigeria: has primary health care made a difference? J Community Med Prim Health Care. 2004;16:47-54
- Egbewale B, Odu O. Perception and Utilization of Primary Health Care Services in a Semi-Urban Community in South-Western Nigeria. J Community Med Prim Health Care. 2013; 24:11-20.
- Andersen RM, Newman JF. Social and Individual determinants of medicine utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Quarterly.1973; 51(1), 95-124.
- Babitsch B, Gohl D, von Lengerke T. Re-visiting Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998-2011. GMS Psycho-Soc-Med. 2012;9.
- Gabrysch S, Campbell OM. Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2009; 9, 34 -51
- Alenoghena IO, Isah EC, Isara AR. Maternal health services uptake and its determinants in public primary health care facilities in Edo State, Nigeria. The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal. 2015;22(1):25-31.
- Cochrane, W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd edition), New York: John Wiley and Sons
- Yaya S, Okonofua FE, Ntoimo L, Kadio B, Deuboue, Imongan W, Balami Increasing Women's access to skilled pregnancy care to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in rural Edo state, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial.Global Health Research and Policy.2018; 3:12.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0066-y
- Ajayi IO, Osakinle DC: Socio-demographic factors determining the adequacy of Antenatal care among women visiting Ekiti State Primary Health Care Centers. 2013; OJHAS 12 (2).
- Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Barriers to antenatal care use in Nigeria: evidence from non-users and implications for maternal health programming. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15.
- Gage AJ. Barriers to the Utilization of maternal health care in rural Mali. Social Science andMedicine.2007; 65(8), 1666- 82.
- Ortiz, A. V. (2007). Determinants of demand for antenatal care in Colombia. Health Policy, 86, 363-372.
- Chandhiok, N., Dhillon, S. B., Kambo, I., & Saxena, C. N. (2006). Determinants of antenatal care utilization in rural areas of India: A cross-sectional study from 28 districts. The Journal of Obstetricsand Gynecology of India,56(1), 47-52
- Wilunda, C; Quagho, G; Putoto, G; Risa, T; Federico, C; Abebe, D; Manenti, F et al(2015): Determinants of Utilization of antenatal care and skilled birth attendant in South WestShoa Zone, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Reproductive Health (2015); 12:74.
- Fikre AA, Demissie M. Prevalence of institutional delivery and associated factors in Dadota Woreda(district), Oromia regional state, Ethiopia.Reproductive Health.2012;9:33 doi.10.1186/1742-4755.9.33
- Tsegay Y, Gebrehiwot T, Goicolea I, Edin K, Lemma H, Sebastian MS. Determinants of antenatal and delivery care utilization in Tigray region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:30.doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-30.
- Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, GulmezogluAM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health.2014;11(1):71. DOI:10.1186/1742-4755-11-71
- Fawole OI, Adeoye IA. Women's status within the household as determinants of maternal health care use in Nigeria. African Health Sciences.2015; 15(1):217-225.
- Singh K, Bloom S, Haney E, Olurunsanye C, Brodish P. Gender Equality and Childbirth in a health facility: Nigeria and MDG5. Afri J Reprod Health .2012; 16(3):123-129.
- Yaya S, Okonofua FE, Ntoimo L, Udenige O, Bishwajit G. Gender Inequality as a barrier to women's access to skilled pregnancy care in rural Nigeria: a qualitative study. International Health, 2019; ihz019,https://doi.org/10.1093/ in health/ ihz2019.