<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0"><Article><Journal><PublisherName>ajhe</PublisherName><JournalTitle>African Journal of Health Economics</JournalTitle><PISSN>C</PISSN><EISSN>o</EISSN><Volume-Issue>Volume 6 Issue 2</Volume-Issue><IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><Season>December 2017</Season><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue><IssueOA>Y</IssueOA><PubDate><Year>-0001</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>30</Day></PubDate><ArticleType>Review &amp; Research  </ArticleType><ArticleTitle>Inequality in Health Care Sector in India: A case Study of Health Facility, Human&#13;
Resources for Health and Amenities Distribution at the District level in Four Indian&#13;
States.&#13;
</ArticleTitle><SubTitle/><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA><FirstPage>26</FirstPage><LastPage>37</LastPage><AuthorList><Author><FirstName>BRIJESH C</FirstName><LastName>PUROHIT</LastName><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Affiliation/><CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor><ORCID/></Author></AuthorList><DOI/><Abstract>Across nations, National Health Policies, including that of India, have emphasised a&#13;
preference for equitable health care facilities. Keeping these emphases on equity in mind we&#13;
explored four Indian states using sub-state level (or district level) data. We applied mainly,&#13;
three well established indicators, namely Gini coefficient and Thiel’s T and L indices to&#13;
gauge magnitudes of inequity. Using individual state level aggregate data, we compared our&#13;
results between two periods for the same state which included one high income and another&#13;
low income Indian state. Also we compared across four states, namely, Punjab, Karnataka,&#13;
Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal using the most recent information available for the year.&#13;
Our results indicate that government investment in three tier health facilities expansion&#13;
comprising of primary, secondary and tertiary level care, has indeed resulted in low&#13;
inequities in terms of health facilities availability and distribution. However, private health&#13;
facilities or certain specific public health facilities did not seem to be much equitable&#13;
particularly at the sub-state level. The focus of our results are on availability as it relates to&#13;
geographical distribution and did not indicate equitable utilisation of health care facilities or&#13;
health care outcomes at the district levels.</Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords>Gini Coefficient, Inequality National Health, Theil Entropy</Keywords><URLs><Abstract>https://ajhe.org.in/admin/abstract?id=5833</Abstract></URLs><References><ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle><ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage><ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage><References/></References></Journal></Article></article>
